Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-01 07:01:09
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-01 07:01:09
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:quoted
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <redacted> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted>Hi Cong. I think this is premature. Please let the discussion and implementation for %pI[gS]<foo> play out and be accepted into next before using it in other subsystems.
Yeah, I already talked with Daniel off-list, and I agree his %pIS patch should go first. (Also I apologized to him for forgetting to credit him when I submitted this patchset.)