On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:18 PM, David Stevens [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

4. clean up the multi-dest tx code

Everybody likes their own code, of course, but I think the original
was cleaner. A vxlan_rdst was part of an fdb structure because all
fdbs require a remote destination, while the clean-up changes that
to a list which may then be NULL, and in my opinion is notably less
clean. I don't know the reasoning for that-- perhaps some thread I
missed?

Maybe this one:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/271383

So, I guess I don't see what you're trying to fix here, other than
preventing snoop updates on static entries, which I agree with.

                                                        +-DLS

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.