Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a long line
From: Gerlando Falauto <hidden>
Date: 2013-05-01 17:35:19
Hi, On 05/01/2013 07:16 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Gerlando Falauto <redacted> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 18:41:17 +0200quoted
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <redacted> --- Changes from v3: * Added "and break a long line" to the commit message Changes from v2: * Split cosmetic (this patch) from functional changes (next patch)Never resubmit patches by themselves, always resubmit the entire series.
I was just wondering what happens in that case, thank you for the explanation, I had no idea.
Because when one patch has problems, I toss the entire series from patchwork,
Is "v3b" good or shall I just use v4 instead? Do I also need to change the version number (and add "Changes from previous version" lines) to the subsequent patches, even though nothing has actually changed)? Should have I used a cover letter to begin with? > and by resubmitting the entire series again you are also giving me important > information, you're telling me that the subsequent patches in the series > still apply cleanly even though the first one has changed. That I don't understand. I thought it would be the other way around, that's why I resubmitted only the one which changed. If I resubmit the entire series, how can you tell patches 2 and 3 are identical to the previous version I posted? Last question: Is chain reply OK? Thanks for your patience, Gerlando
I've tossed this patch too, resubmit this properly, thanks.