On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:34:56PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:45:25PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Friday 25 January 2013, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@arndb.de]
Marking it as __maybe_unused avoids a harmless gcc warning.
Alternatively, just declare it using the RPC_IFDEBUG() macro.
Right, makes sense: that's more consistent with other functions
doing the same thing. Thanks for taking a look.
NAK.
There is already a fix queued up as a result of a previous report I
sent, but for some reason (which I didn't question) it was decided
not to queue it for -rc.
See Bruce's reply on lkml: 20130108212816.GA24572@fieldses.org
Apologies, I've seen so many "stop sending me post-rc1 patches that
don't fix serious crashes!" flames.
I guess obviousl compile fixes should be an exception--if nothing else
it'd save a lot of duplicated work as this is something like the 3rd
patch I've seen for this.
--b.
Ok, makes sense. Then again, if that fix is queued for 3.9, maybe
it still makes sense to take the simpler fix into 3.8, and remove
it in 3.9 along with the other instances of RPC_IFDEBUG.