On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:44:55PM +0000, Mark Einon wrote:
On 19 January 2013 11:03, Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:
<snip>
quoted
et131x_get_regs() has endian bugs calling et131x_mii_read().
</snip>
Hi Dan,
Could you be a bit more descriptive about the issues you think there
are with these calls?
Sorry, that was sloppy on my part. Here's what I meant:
et131x_mii_read(adapter, MII_BMCR, (u16 *)®s_buff[num++]);
That puts the number in the 2 high bits which works for little
endian systems but not for big endian. It should be something like:
u16 tmp;
et131x_mii_read(adapter, MII_BMCR, &tmp);
regs_buff[num++] = tmp;
regards,
dan carpenter