Re: [PATCH net-next rfc 2/2] tuntap: allow unpriveledge user to enable and disable queues
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-12-11 12:27:04
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:03:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Currently, when a file is attached to tuntap through TUNSETQUEUE, the uid/gid and CAP_NET_ADMIN were checked, and we use this ioctl to create and destroy queues. Sometimes, userspace such as qemu need to the ability to enable and disable a specific queue without priveledge since guest operating system may change the number of queues it want use. To support this kind of ability, this patch introduce a flag enabled which is used to track whether the queue is enabled by userspace. And also restrict that only one deivce could be used for a queue to attach. With this patch, the DAC checking when adding queues through IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE is still done and after this, IFF_DETACH_QUEUE/IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE could be used to disable/enable this queue. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted> --- drivers/net/tun.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index d593f56..43831a7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct tun_file { /* only used for fasnyc */ unsigned int flags; u16 queue_index; + bool enabled; }; struct tun_flow_entry {@@ -345,9 +346,11 @@ unlock: static u16 tun_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev); + struct tun_file *tfile; struct tun_flow_entry *e; u32 txq = 0; u32 numqueues = 0; + int i; rcu_read_lock(); numqueues = tun->numqueues;@@ -366,6 +369,19 @@ static u16 tun_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb) txq -= numqueues; } + tfile = rcu_dereference(tun->tfiles[txq]); + if (unlikely(!tfile->enabled))
This unlikely tag is suspicious. It should be perfectly legal to use less queues than created.
+ /* tun_detach() should make sure there's at least one queue
+ * could be used to do the tranmission.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < numqueues; i++) {
+ tfile = rcu_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
+ if (tfile->enabled) {
+ txq = i;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+Worst case this will do a linear scan over all queueus on each packet. Instead, I think we need a list of all queues and only install the active ones in the array.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
rcu_read_unlock(); return txq; }@@ -386,6 +402,36 @@ static void tun_set_real_num_queues(struct tun_struct *tun) netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(tun->dev, tun->numqueues); } +static int tun_enable(struct tun_file *tfile) +{ + if (tfile->enabled == true)
simply if (tfile->enabled)
+ return -EINVAL;
Actually it's better to have operations be idempotent. If it's enabled, enabling should be a NOP not an error.
+
+ tfile->enabled = true;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tun_disable(struct tun_file *tfile)
+{
+ struct tun_struct *tun = rcu_dereference_protected(tfile->tun,
+ lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+ u16 index = tfile->queue_index;
+
+ if (!tun)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (tun->numqueues == 1)
+ return -EINVAL;So if there's a single queue we can't disable it, but if there are > 1 we can disable them all. This seems arbitrary.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ + BUG_ON(index >= tun->numqueues); + tfile->enabled = false; + + synchronize_net(); + tun_flow_delete_by_queue(tun, index); + + return 0; +} + static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean) { struct tun_file *ntfile;@@ -446,6 +492,7 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev) BUG_ON(!tfile); wake_up_all(&tfile->wq.wait); rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, NULL); + tfile->enabled = false; --tun->numqueues; } BUG_ON(tun->numqueues != 0);@@ -490,6 +537,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file) rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile); sock_hold(&tfile->sk); tun->numqueues++; + tfile->enabled = true; tun_set_real_num_queues(tun);@@ -672,6 +720,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) if (txq >= tun->numqueues) goto drop; + /* Drop packet if the queue was not enabled */ + if (!tfile->enabled) + goto drop; + tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_net_xmit %d\n", skb->len); BUG_ON(!tfile);@@ -1010,6 +1062,9 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile, bool zerocopy = false; int err; + if (!tfile->enabled) + return -EINVAL; + if (!(tun->flags & TUN_NO_PI)) { if ((len -= sizeof(pi)) > total_len) return -EINVAL;@@ -1199,6 +1254,9 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_pi pi = { 0, skb->protocol }; ssize_t total = 0; + if (!tfile->enabled) + return -EINVAL; + if (!(tun->flags & TUN_NO_PI)) { if ((len -= sizeof(pi)) < 0) return -EINVAL;@@ -1769,15 +1827,21 @@ static int tun_set_queue(struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr) if (dev->netdev_ops != &tap_netdev_ops && dev->netdev_ops != &tun_netdev_ops) ret = -EINVAL; - else if (tun_not_capable(tun)) - ret = -EPERM; - /* TUNSETIFF is needed to do permission checking */ - else if (tun->numqueues == 0) - ret = -EPERM; - else - ret = tun_attach(tun, file); + else { + if (!rcu_dereference(tfile->tun)) {
Should be rcu_dereference_protected.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ if (tun_not_capable(tun) || + tun->numqueues == 0) + ret = -EPERM; + else + ret = tun_attach(tun, file); + } + else { + /* FIXME: permission check? */ + ret = tun_enable(tfile); + } + } } else if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_DETACH_QUEUE) - __tun_detach(tfile, false); + tun_disable(tfile); else ret = -EINVAL;@@ -2085,6 +2149,7 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file) tfile->socket.file = file; tfile->socket.ops = &tun_socket_ops; + tfile->enabled = false; sock_init_data(&tfile->socket, &tfile->sk); sk_change_net(&tfile->sk, tfile->net);-- 1.7.1