The double negation is probably a typo error
Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot <redacted>
---
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6.c
index 00ee17c..d9efe32 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int ipv6_get_l4proto(const struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int nhoff,
}
protoff = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, extoff, &nexthdr, &frag_off);
/*
- * (protoff == skb->len) mean that the packet doesn't have no data
+ * (protoff == skb->len) mean that the packet does not have any data
* except of IPv6 & ext headers. but it's tracked anyway. - YK
*/
if (protoff < 0 || (frag_off & htons(~0x7)) != 0) {--
1.7.10.4