Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipip: advertise tunnel param via rtnl
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-09 19:42:50
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 18:00 +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
If the principle is approved, yes. If we add it, we will have two ways to manage these tunnels, via netlink and via ioctl, is it ok? A side effect could be to have an option or an argument to the module to not create the control interface (tunl0, sit0, ...).
The principle is already used for gre tunnels, so it definitely is approved ;)