Le 09/11/2012 17:37, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 17:09 +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
quoted
It is usefull for daemons that monitor link event to have the full parameters of
these interfaces when a rtnl message is sent.
It allows also to dump them via rtnetlink.
It is based on what is done for GRE tunnels.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <redacted>
---
Nice !
Note this also adds support for link creation.
Do you plan to add iproute2 support for :
ip link add ipip1 type ipip remote 10.246.8.36
Thanks
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
If the principle is approved, yes. If we add it, we will have two
ways to manage these tunnels, via netlink and via ioctl, is it ok?
A side effect could be to have an option or an argument to the module to not
create the control interface (tunl0, sit0, ...).