Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 3 authors, 2012-11-10

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipip: advertise tunnel param via rtnl

From: Nicolas Dichtel <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-09 17:01:03

Le 09/11/2012 17:37, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 17:09 +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
quoted
It is usefull for daemons that monitor link event to have the full parameters of
these interfaces when a rtnl message is sent.
It allows also to dump them via rtnetlink.

It is based on what is done for GRE tunnels.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <redacted>
---
Nice !

Note this also adds support for link creation.

Do you plan to add iproute2 support for :

ip link add ipip1 type ipip remote 10.246.8.36

Thanks

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
If the principle is approved, yes. If we add it, we will have two
ways to manage these tunnels, via netlink and via ioctl, is it ok?

A side effect could be to have an option or an argument to the module to not 
create the control interface (tunl0, sit0, ...).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help