[PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 02/16] userns: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 03/16] mm,ksm: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 04/16] workqueue: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 06/16] tracepoint: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
Re: [PATCH v8 06/16] tracepoint: use new hashtable implementation · Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 07/16] net,9p: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 08/16] block,elevator: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 09/16] SUNRPC/cache: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 10/16] dlm: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 11/16] net,l2tp: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 12/16] dm: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 14/16] net,rds: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 16/16] tracing output: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
Re: [PATCH v8 16/16] tracing output: use new hashtable implementation · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 15/16] openvswitch: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 13/16] lockd: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
[PATCH v8 05/16] mm/huge_memory: use new hashtable implementation · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-30
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> · 2012-10-30
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-10-30
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Jim Rees <hidden> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Sasha Levin <hidden> · 2012-11-02
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> · 2012-10-31
Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-10-31
RE: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable · David Laight <hidden> · 2012-10-31

Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable

From: Linus Torvalds <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-31 03:49:15
Also in: dm-devel, linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:

Oh, well... there go my blackmail plans ;-)  Seriously, though, I'm at loss
regarding several embedded architectures - arch/score, in particular,
seems to be completely orphaned.

Don't worry about it. Do a best-effort, and if nobody ever reacts
about some odd-ball architecture, whatever.

We won't start deleting architectures over something like this, but it
might be another sign down the road that some arch code can be removed
entirely.

So it's not arch/score I'd worry about. It's all the *other* architectures..

             Linus

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help