Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 3 authors, 2012-10-03

Re: [PATCH 4/5] ucc_geth: Increase RX ring buffer from 32 to 64

From: Joakim Tjernlund <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-03 20:13:40

David Miller [off-list ref] wrote on 2012/10/03 21:38:55:
From: Joakim Tjernlund <redacted>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:17:58 +0200
quoted
Ping? Got no comments and I can see it in net or net-next trees either.
No patch will be applied to the tree when one of the indiviual patches
get feedback and request changes from you.

When an individual patch must be redone, you must resend the entire
series not just the individual patch which changed.
oh, I see what I did wrong. I sent them as series which may have internal dependencies.
However, each patch can be applied on its own.
You also never need to ask the kind of question you are asking here,
you simply need to look into patch work to see what the state of
your patches is:

I maintain this state exactly so people don't need to waste precious
developer time asking "what is the state of my patch" like you are
making me do right here.

See:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?state=*&q=ucc_geth
Ahh, better bookmark this page for future use.
And as you can see this entire series is marked as either "RFC"
or "Changes Requested"
Yes, I see that now.
I guess I should resend each patch separately then?
(Possibly wait until I have figured out the lockless TX stuff)
Even worse, you did this for not one but several of the patches you
posted.
Sorry about that.

 Jocke
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help