On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:

quoted

If nobody else thinks this patch is better, let's at least add a comment in
__dev_printk() and __netdev_printk() to fix dynamic debug, if these are changed.

Or maybe make dynamic_emit_prefix a public function
and move the __dynamic_<foo>_printk functions to
nearby the __<foo>_printk functions so it's easier to
see that changing one requires the other to change.

ok, that makes sense to me.

Thanks,

-Jason