Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 6 authors, 2012-09-26

Re: [PATCH 0/5] dev_<level> and dynamic_debug cleanups

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2012-08-30 18:25:25
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:43 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg.

Joe Perches (5):
  dev_dbg/dynamic_debug: Update to use printk_emit, optimize stack
  netdev_printk/dynamic_netdev_dbg: Directly call printk_emit
  netdev_printk/netif_printk: Remove a superfluous logging colon
  dev: Add dev_vprintk_emit and dev_printk_emit
  device and dynamic_debug: Use dev_vprintk_emit and dev_printk_emit
Ive tested this on 2 builds differing only by DYNAMIC_DEBUG
It works for me on x86-64

However, I just booted a non-dyndbg build on x86-32, and got this.


root@voyage:~# dmesg | grep Unknown
mac80211: Unknown symbol __dynamic_dev_dbg (err 0)
mac80211: Unknown symbol __dynamic_pr_debug (err 0)
scx200_acb: Unknown symbol __dynamic_dev_dbg (err 0)
scx200_acb: Unknown symbol __dynamic_pr_debug (err 0)
hwmon: Unknown symbol __dynamic_dev_dbg (err 0)
nsc_gpio: Unknown symbol __dynamic_dev_dbg (err 0)
nsc_gpio: Unknown symbol __dynamic_dev_dbg (err 0)
root@voyage:~#

It may be my error, will investigate asap,
but wanted to report now.
Thanks, but I don't know how this is possible.
There are no 32/64 component tests in this code.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help