Thread (67 messages) 67 messages, 9 authors, 2012-09-06

Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable

From: Steven Rostedt <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-04 15:35:54
Also in: dm-devel, linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml

On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 19:00 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Looking again at:

+#define hash_for_each_size(name, bits, bkt, node, obj, member)                 \
+       for (bkt = 0; bkt < HASH_SIZE(bits); bkt++)                             \
+               hlist_for_each_entry(obj, node, &name[bkt], member)

you will notice that a "break" or "continue" in the inner loop will not
affect the outer loop, which is certainly not what the programmer would
expect!

I advise strongly against creating such error-prone construct.
A few existing loop macros do this. But they require a do { } while ()
approach, and all have a comment.

It's used by do_each_thread() in sched.h and ftrace does this as well.
Look at kernel/trace/ftrace.c at do_for_each_ftrace_rec().

Yes it breaks 'break' but it does not break 'continue' as it would just
go to the next item that would have been found (like a normal for
would).

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help