Re: [RFC PATCH bridge 0/5] Add basic VLAN support to bridges
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-08-30 12:36:04
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:29:50PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
This series of patches provides an ability to add VLAN IDs to the bridge ports. This is similar to what can be found in most switches. The bridge port may have any number of VLANs added to it including vlan 0 for untagged traffic. When vlans are added to the port, only traffic tagged with particular vlan will forwarded over this port. Additionally, vlan ids are added to FDB entries and become part of the lookup. This way we correctly identify the FDB entry. There are still pieces missing. I don't yet support adding a static fdb entry with a particular vlan. There is no netlink support for carrying a vlan id. I'd like to hear thoughts of whether this is usufull and something we should persue. The default behavior ofthe bridge is unchanged if no vlans have been configured.
Overall the feature looks good, I can think of some uses for it - for example, it could become useful for VMs if we add support to tap essentially stripping tags in Xmit but maybe you could be more explicit about what you have in mind? Do you plan to add tap support as well? Also - what tool support do you plan? I also found some coding style issues and some bugs in the patchset. Sent on list. Hope this helps. -- MST