Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-29 08:43:05
Also in:
lvs-devel, netfilter-devel
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 09:02 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 07:49 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 16:23 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:quoted
This patch is necessary, to make IPVS work, after Patrick McHardys IPv6 NAT defragmentation changes. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <redacted> --- In V2: the tunnel mode is no longer a special case. net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c index 67a3978..56f6d5d 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c@@ -88,7 +88,14 @@ __ip_vs_dst_check(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, u32 rtos) static inline bool __mtu_check_toobig_v6(const struct sk_buff *skb, u32 mtu) { - if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) { + if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size) { + /* frag_max_size tell us that, this packet have been + * defragmented by netfilter IPv6 conntrack module. + */ + if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu) + return true; /* largest fragment violate MTU */Implicit: else return false (if it makes it more clear, not sure)quoted
quoted
+ } + else if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) { return true; /* Packet size violate MTU size */ }Couldnt you use a single test ? if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu) return true; if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) return true;Nope, this will not work. If (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > 0) then we have a defragmented packet, this means that skb->len cannot be used for MTU checking, because skb->len is now the total length of all the fragments (which your solution will fall-through to)
If the packet was not fragmented, its was a single frame. But if this frame length is above mtu, packet is not too big ? Sorry if its a stupid question.