Thread (67 messages) 67 messages, 11 authors, 2012-08-29

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-29 08:43:05
Also in: lvs-devel, netfilter-devel

On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 09:02 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 07:49 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 16:23 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
quoted
This patch is necessary, to make IPVS work, after Patrick McHardys
IPv6 NAT defragmentation changes.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <redacted>
---
In V2: the tunnel mode is no longer a special case.

 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
index 67a3978..56f6d5d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
@@ -88,7 +88,14 @@ __ip_vs_dst_check(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, u32 rtos)
 static inline bool
 __mtu_check_toobig_v6(const struct sk_buff *skb, u32 mtu)
 {
-	if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) {
+	if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size) {
+		/* frag_max_size tell us that, this packet have been
+		 * defragmented by netfilter IPv6 conntrack module.
+		 */
+		if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu)
+			return true; /* largest fragment violate MTU */
Implicit:         else
     			return false

(if it makes it more clear, not sure)
quoted
quoted
+	}
+	else if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) {
 		return true; /* Packet size violate MTU size */
 	}
Couldnt you use a single test ?

if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu)
	return true;

if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb))
	return true;
Nope, this will not work.

If (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > 0) then we have a defragmented packet,
this means that skb->len cannot be used for MTU checking, because
skb->len is now the total length of all the fragments (which your
solution will fall-through to)
If the packet was not fragmented, its was a single frame.

But if this frame length is above mtu, packet is not too big ?

Sorry if its a stupid question.


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help