Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 4 authors, 2012-08-17

Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix compile issue with disabled CONFIG_NET_NS

From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-16 18:58:43

Ulrich Weber [off-list ref] writes:
struct seq_net_private has no struct net
if CONFIG_NET_NS is not enabled
My mistake.

Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Weber <redacted>
Ulrich do you get any performance advantage by disabling the network
namespace?

I am wondering if there is any benefit to keeping it possible to disable
the network namespace?

The original reason for the option was so that distributions and
other who wanted to avoid new code could protect their users, and
that reasons seems to have long since passed.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 net/sctp/proc.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
index 3e62ee5..d9cb2ab 100644
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ static void * sctp_eps_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 /* Display sctp endpoints (/proc/net/sctp/eps). */
 static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
-	struct seq_net_private *priv = seq->private;
 	struct sctp_hashbucket *head;
 	struct sctp_ep_common *epb;
 	struct sctp_endpoint *ep;
@@ -216,7 +215,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
 		ep = sctp_ep(epb);
 		sk = epb->sk;
-		if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), priv->net))
+		if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), seq_file_net(seq)))
 			continue;
 		seq_printf(seq, "%8pK %8pK %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk,
 			   sctp_sk(sk)->type, sk->sk_state, hash,
@@ -307,7 +306,6 @@ static void * sctp_assocs_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 /* Display sctp associations (/proc/net/sctp/assocs). */
 static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
-	struct seq_net_private *priv = seq->private;
 	struct sctp_hashbucket *head;
 	struct sctp_ep_common *epb;
 	struct sctp_association *assoc;
@@ -324,7 +322,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
 		assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
 		sk = epb->sk;
-		if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), priv->net))
+		if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), seq_file_net(seq)))
 			continue;
 		seq_printf(seq,
 			   "%8pK %8pK %-3d %-3d %-2d %-4d "
@@ -423,7 +421,6 @@ static void sctp_remaddr_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
-	struct seq_net_private *priv = seq->private;
 	struct sctp_hashbucket *head;
 	struct sctp_ep_common *epb;
 	struct sctp_association *assoc;
@@ -438,7 +435,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	sctp_local_bh_disable();
 	read_lock(&head->lock);
 	sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
-		if (!net_eq(sock_net(epb->sk), priv->net))
+		if (!net_eq(sock_net(epb->sk), seq_file_net(seq)))
 			continue;
 		assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
 		list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help