Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 6 authors, 2012-07-24

Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Add support for EEH error recovery

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-07-23 21:44:22

From: Or Gerlitz <redacted>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:42:08 +0300
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:34 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Can we please move forward, if he implemented the feature properly
and he tested it successfully, unless you can find a logic or
stylistic flaw in his patch please ACK it.

You can't hold his changes back while you work out how _YOU_ can
test it to your liking.
Hi Dave,

We're trying to act in  R/R (Responsive and Responsible) manner -
namely Shlomo did code review of the patches and we want to further
evaluate them by testing, I think its fully legitimate to test a patch
before ACK-ing.  Doing these types of tests isn't around my personal
typical daily menu and I'm asking for some directives from the author
on how to issue that testing, I don't see what wrong here. We're
planning anyway to go deeper around this area and enhance the PCI
hotplug /error handling related code in the driver, so there's an
initial learing curve here, makes sense? we can move the Q&A for the
testing to be off-list if you prefer it to go that way.
But ACK his patch, because you have not found any problems with it.

This is taking days, and you're stalling further progress.

I never let patches rot in patchwork more than a few days, as this
patch has already.

Either ACK or provide a legitimate reason to reject it now.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help