On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 21:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:08 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:58 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
Absolutely, I am talking about virtio here. I'm not kicking
u64_stats_sync idea I am just saying that simple locking
would work for virtio and might be better as it
gives us a way to get counters atomically.
Which lock do you own in the RX path ?
You'll have to add a lock in fast path. This sounds really a bad choice
to me.
You have the NAPI 'lock', so when gathering stats you can synchronise
using napi_disable() ;-)
Nice, this adds one new bug in network stack.
Really guys, can we stop this thread, please ?