Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2012-07-09

Re: "ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready" with IPv6

From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-29 15:24:39

On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 02:36 +0000, Arvid Brodin wrote:
Hi,

After 'ip link set eth0 up' on an avr32 board (network driver macb), the device ends up in
operational mode "UNKNOWN":

# ip link
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:24:74:00:17:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

Unplugging and plugging in the network cable gets the device to mode "UP".

This is a problem for me because I'm trying to use this device as a "slave" device (for a
virtual HSR device*) and I need to be able to decide if the slave device is operational or
not.

Following Stephen's advice here:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2008/9/24/3398834 I checked the macb.c code
and noticed they do not call netif_carrier_off() neither before register_netdev() nor in
dev_open().
It should be called after register_netdev() and before the driver's
ndo_open implementation returns.
I added the call before register_netdev(), which fixed the problem. However, if I then
enable IPv6:

# ip link set eth0 up
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
eth0: link up (100/Full)
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
This looks normal.
Any idea what is happening / what I'm doing wrong? (This is not just cosmetic; is some
situations this seems to kill the interface - e.g. ping does not work, down/up does not
help...) Things work fine without IPv6 configured.
Perhaps some packets sent automatically by IPv6 are triggering a driver
bug?  Or there is a bug in multicast support, which IPv6 always uses.

Ben.
*N.B. I'm writing a driver for a network protocol called "High-availability Seamless
Redundancy".
-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help