Re: Strange latency spikes/TX network stalls on Sun Fire X4150(x86) and e1000e
From: Hiroaki SHIMODA <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-30 10:44:05
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:40:31 +0200 Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 09:06 +0900, Hiroaki SHIMODA wrote:quoted
While reading the bql code, I have some questions. 1) dql_completed() and dql_queued() can be called concurrently, so dql->num_queued could change while processing dql_completed(). Is it intentional to refer num_queued from "dql->" each time ?not sure it can have problems, but doing the read once is indeed a good plan.quoted
2) From the comment in the code * - The queue was over-limit in the previous interval and * when enqueuing it was possible that all queued data * had been consumed. and * Queue was not starved, check if the limit can be decreased. * A decrease is only considered if the queue has been busy in * the whole interval (the check above). the calculation of all_prev_completed should take into account completed == dql->prev_num_queued case ? On current implementation, limit shrinks easily and some NIC hit TX stalls. To mitigate TX stalls, should we fix all_prev_completed rather than individual driver ?Not sure what you mean
While examining ping problem, below pattern is often observed.
TIME
dql_queued() dql_completed() |
a) initial state |
|
b) X bytes queued V
c) Y bytes queued
d) X bytes completed
e) Z bytes queued
f) Y bytes completed
a) dql->limit has already some value and there is no in-flight packet.
b) X bytes queued.
c) Y bytes queued and excess limit.
d) X bytes completed and dql->prev_ovlimit is set and also
dql->prev_num_queued is set Y.
e) Z bytes queued.
f) Y bytes completed. inprogress and prev_inprogress are true.
At f), if I read the comment correctly, all_prev_completed becomes
true and limit should be increased. But POSDIFF() ignores
(A == B) case, so limit is decreased.
I thought excess limit decrement induces the TX stalls.
quoted
3) limit calculation fails to consider integer wrap around in one place ?Yesquoted
Here is the patch what I meant.diff --git a/lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c b/lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c@@ -11,22 +11,27 @@ #include <linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h> #define POSDIFF(A, B) ((A) > (B) ? (A) - (B) : 0) +#define POSDIFFI(A, B) ((int)((A) - (B)) > 0 ? (A) - (B) : 0) +#define AFTER_EQ(A, B) ((int)((A) - (B)) >= 0) /* Records completed count and recalculates the queue limit */ void dql_completed(struct dql *dql, unsigned int count) { unsigned int inprogress, prev_inprogress, limit; - unsigned int ovlimit, all_prev_completed, completed; + unsigned int ovlimit, completed, num_queued; + bool all_prev_completed; + + num_queued = dql->num_queued;I suggest : num_queued = ACCESS_ONCE(dql->num_queued); Or else compiler is free to do whatever he wants.
Thank you for your suggestion.