Re: [PATCH v17 15/15] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter
From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Date: 2012-04-09 19:46:41
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Date: 2012-04-09 19:46:41
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:02:00 -0500 Will Drewry [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Documents how system call filtering using Berkeley Packet Filter programs works and how it may be used. Includes an example for x86 and a semi-generic example using a macro-based code generator. ... +Adding architecture support +----------------------- + +See arch/Kconfig for the authoritative requirements. In general, if an +architecture supports both ptrace_event and seccomp, it will be able to +support seccomp filter with minor fixup: SIGSYS support and seccomp return +value checking. Then it must just add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER +to its arch-specific Kconfig.diff --git a/samples/Makefile b/samples/Makefile index 2f75851..5ef08bb 100644 --- a/samples/Makefile +++ b/samples/MakefileOh good, I was going to ask about that. Can we get this code into tools/testing/selftests? That way people will run it more often and it's more likely to be maintained as the code evolves.
I'm currently using a lightweight testsuite in addition to the samples. It's a little more oriented at pass/fail behavior. Would it be more appropriate to post those in addition to, or instead of, samples? thanks!