Re: [PATCH v17 09/15] seccomp: remove duplicated failure logging
From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Date: 2012-04-09 19:26:06
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:01:54 -0500 Will Drewry [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Kees Cook <redacted> This consolidates the seccomp filter error logging path and adds more details to the audit log. ...--- a/include/linux/audit.h +++ b/include/linux/audit.h... #define audit_inode(n,d) do { (void)(d); } while (0) #define audit_inode_child(i,p) do { ; } while (0) #define audit_core_dumps(i) do { ; } while (0) -#define audit_seccomp(i) do { ; } while (0) +#define audit_seccomp(i,s,c) do { ; } while (0)Sigh. Someone please convert all these to C. That way we get typechecking and don't need dopey party tricks like that "(void)(d)" to squish compilation warnings.quoted
...--- a/kernel/auditsc.c +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@#include <linux/syscalls.h> #include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> +#include <linux/compat.h> #include "audit.h"@@ -2710,13 +2711,18 @@ void audit_core_dumps(long signr)audit_log_end(ab); } -void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall) +void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code) { struct audit_buffer *ab; ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND); - audit_log_abend(ab, "seccomp", SIGKILL); + audit_log_abend(ab, "seccomp", signr); audit_log_format(ab, " syscall=%ld", syscall); +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + audit_log_format(ab, " compat=%d", is_compat_task()); +#endifWe don't need the ifdef for compilation reasons now. The question is: should we emit the compat= record on non-compat-capable architectures? Doing so would be safer - making it conditional invites people to write x86-only usersapce.
I'd certainly prefer it always being there for exactly that reason. Kees, Eric, any preferences? Unless I hear one, I'll just drop the ifdefs in the next revision. thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html