On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
Le dimanche 18 mars 2012 à 12:56 -0400, Paul Gortmaker a écrit :
...
quoted
* we add this skb back into the pool, if it's the right size
@@ -2557,13 +2568,15 @@ static int gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
}
/* If we freed a buffer, we can restart transmission, if necessary */
- if (__netif_subqueue_stopped(dev, tx_queue->qindex) && tx_queue->num_txbdfree)
- netif_wake_subqueue(dev, tx_queue->qindex);
+ if (__netif_subqueue_stopped(dev, tqi) && tx_queue->num_txbdfree)
+ netif_wake_subqueue(dev, tqi);
You can use netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) here instead of
__netif_subqueue_stopped(dev, tqi)
Yes, and it looks better too. I will do it as a patch #4 since I think
there is some small value in leaving the above patch chunk alone,
since it makes it clear that it was just the introduction of a local
variable and the code was otherwise unchanged here.
Will resend shortly....
Thanks,
Paul.
---
quoted
/* Update dirty indicators */
tx_queue->skb_dirtytx = skb_dirtytx;
tx_queue->dirty_tx = bdp;
+ netdev_tx_completed_queue(txq, howmany, bytes_sent);
+
return howmany;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html