Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2012-04-06

Re: sendmmsg: put_user vs __put_user

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-03-31 21:27:15
Also in: lkml

From: Ulrich Drepper <redacted>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:30:25 -0400
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 20:51, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Compat processes are not able to generate virtual addresses anywhere
near the range where the kernel resides, so the address range
verification done by put_user() is completely superfluous and
therefore not necessary.  The normal exception handling done by the
access is completely sufficient.
I was more thinking about the effects of might_fault() then additional tests.
This is very clearly in a context where locks are not held and sleeping
would be fine, so I don't see any value in that either.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help