Re: sendmmsg: put_user vs __put_user
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-03-31 21:27:15
Also in:
lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-03-31 21:27:15
Also in:
lkml
From: Ulrich Drepper <redacted> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:30:25 -0400
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 20:51, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Compat processes are not able to generate virtual addresses anywhere near the range where the kernel resides, so the address range verification done by put_user() is completely superfluous and therefore not necessary. The normal exception handling done by the access is completely sufficient.I was more thinking about the effects of might_fault() then additional tests.
This is very clearly in a context where locks are not held and sleeping would be fine, so I don't see any value in that either.