Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 4 authors, 2012-03-29

Re: [PATCH] tcp: bind() use stronger condition for bind_conflict

From: Daniel Baluta <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 20:08:03
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 10:52 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:11:52 +0300
Alexandru Copot [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
index 02dd203..dfc8bc3 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
 #include <net/inet6_connection_sock.h>

 int inet6_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
-                       const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb)
+                       const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb,
+                           int relax)
Same here
Maybe you can wait for more feedbacks before spin another patch
version just to fix that.


Also 'int relax' should be 'bool relax'... 1/0 -> true/false

Anyway net-next is not open yet...
Eric, Flavio, thanks a lot for your comments. We will resubmit this
when net-next opens.

Please let us know if you have any other observations.

thanks,
Daniel.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help