Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 4 authors, 2012-03-29

Re: [PATCH] tcp: bind() use stronger condition for bind_conflict

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 14:48:41
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 10:52 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:11:52 +0300
Alexandru Copot [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
index 02dd203..dfc8bc3 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
 #include <net/inet6_connection_sock.h>
 
 int inet6_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
-			    const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb)
+			    const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb,
+				int relax)
Same here
Maybe you can wait for more feedbacks before spin another patch 
version just to fix that.


Also 'int relax' should be 'bool relax'... 1/0 -> true/false

Anyway net-next is not open yet...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help