Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix routing metrics
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-02-21 06:36:42
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:19:22 +0100
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:25:57PM -0500, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:44:25 +0100quoted
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:12:11AM -0500, David Miller wrote:quoted
So since this happens, you don't need to check the inetpeer at every metric access. The fact that all routing cache entries get recreated will do it for you.So if rt_init_metrics() is not the right place to check for genid changes, where would you suggest to do it?It is the right place, and since it will happen there for every routing cache entry we use after a flush, the inetpeer issues will be taken care of by it. Therefore you don't need to check anything at metrics access time.Ok, apparently I looked at the wrong place. The only checks at metrics access that might be superfluous are the inet_metrics_new() checks in ipv4_metrics() and ipv6_metrics(). If these are the checks you mean, I'd remove them and resend the patchset.
I'm saying you shouldn't need a metrics access callback nor the rest of your patch at all. Look, when routes change, the routing cache is flushed and the gen ID is incremented. Every single existing routing cache entry is therefore instantly invalid, and will not be used another time. Therefore every route usage afterwards will go through the routing cache entry creation path. And in this path the inetpeer and it's metrics can be validated, out of date metrics freed and replaced with new ones, etc. Whatever might be necessary can all be done here. There is no need to every have special handling at metric access time on a valid routing cache entry, the fact that it's valid and it's gen ID matches up, means there has been no route table changes meanwhile and that the inetpeer metrics have been validated since the last route table change.