Thread (22 messages) flat view 22 messages, 2 authors, 2012-02-24

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix routing metrics

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: 2012-02-09 12:44:18

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:18:37PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:30:37 +0100
quoted
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:29:16PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
quoted
Thinking about this, it seems overkill to check this on every metric
access.

You have an opportunity to validate metrics when the peer is bound to
the route.

This is because any change to the FIB metrics, is in turn a change
to the FIB, which therefore invalidates the entire routing cache.

So you can be sure that a new route cache entry will be created, and
at that creation time you can ensure that we'll respect the updated
FIB metrics if encessary.
Not sure if I get you right here, but that's what this patchset
does. It invalidates the metrics on the peer by incrementing
peer_genid in rt_cache_invalidate() which is invoked on every FIB
change. Then, on slowpath route lookup it checks in rt_init_metrics()
whether the peer_genid changed. If it changed, it exchanges the
invalidated merics with new ones and copies the informations from
the FIB into it.
If the routing cache is invalided, you'll "see" this updated inetpeer
because every single routing cache entry will get rebuilt.
Hm, I still don't get your point. Could you specify this please?

When a route cache entry is created and the peer_genid does not match
the genid on the inetpeer, fresh inetpeer metrics are allocated  and
then published. After that, the new metrics are in proper state and
ready to use.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help