RE: [patch] bna: fix error handling of bnad_get_flash_partition_by_offset()
From: Rasesh Mody <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-10 22:38:41
Also in:
kernel-janitors
From: Rasesh Mody <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-10 22:38:41
Also in:
kernel-janitors
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:16 PM On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 05:53:20PM -0800, Rasesh Mody wrote:quoted
We can't return 0 from the bnad_get_flash_partition_by_offset() on error as the flash partition 0 is a optrom partition. Also we got comments to return proper Linux error codes as ethtool application expects so.It's already treated as an error. A return value of zero means the user gets a return value of -EFAULT. I'm slightly confused by your email. My patch was already merged into git. Can you just send a patch which does what you want? I don't know the subsystem well enough to say how you want zero returns to be handled if the original code was not correct.
I would like to take back my prior statement, we can return 0 from the bnad_get_flash_partition_by_offset on error. Flash partition 1 and not 0 is actually optrom, so there will be no need to handle zero returns differently. Zero returns should be treated as an error and reported as -EFAULTS as its being done in current implementation. Apologies for the confusion. Regards, Rasesh