On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:49 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 23:42 +0000, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
[]
quoted
quoted
@@ -5012,7 +5012,8 @@ static int igb_find_enabled_vfs(struct igb_adapter
*adapter)
vf_devfn = pdev->devfn + 0x80;
pvfdev = pci_get_device(hw->vendor_id, device_id, NULL);
while (pvfdev) {
- if (pvfdev->devfn == vf_devfn)
+ if (pvfdev->devfn == vf_devfn &&
+ (pvfdev->bus->number >= pdev->bus->number))
vfs_found++;
[]
quoted
I'll fix this one too. You start leaning on checkpatch and you get lazy I guess.
I suppose an indentation rule could be created when
arguments on multiple lines don't align at the open
parenthesis, but I'm not going to rewrite emacs
indentation rules.
Presumably it should only be used with --strict.
Anyone think multiple line tests with inequivalent uses
of parentheses like this one should be noted as well?
I tried to create this very fix last year, but I must admit my
checkpatch.pl foo was not that strong... :)
While it would be a good enhancement to checkpatch.pl, I do not see it
as a "critical" fix.