On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:23 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:40:34 -0800
quoted
Perhaps you should break this large patch
into multiple separate patches.
Agreed, this patch is way too large especially for what is obviously
turning out to be a very non-trivial transformation in some cases
and also new patch submitters should generally avoid large patches
like this.
Acked! Will try to separate out trivial & non-trivial changes.
Although, still trivial changes would be big enough. And at the same
time, splitting changes into 118 patches might turn out to be
cumbersome for review.