Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-19 15:43:43
Also in:
linux-nfs, lkml
19.01.2012 19:34, Myklebust, Trond пишет:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbursky@parallels.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:32 AM To: Myklebust, Trond Cc: Dr James Bruce Fields; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Pavel Emelianov; neilb@suse.de; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; James Bottomley; bfields@fieldses.org; davem@davemloft.net; devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware 19.01.2012 19:19, Trond Myklebust пишет:quoted
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 18:48 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:quoted
One more step towards to "NFS in container". With this patch set caches are allocated per network namespace. The following series consists of: --- Stanislav Kinsbursky (5): SUNRPC: cache creation and destruction routines introduced SUNRPC: create unix gid cache per network namespace SUNRPC: create GSS auth cache per network namespace SUNRPC: ip map cache per network namespace cleanup SUNRPC: generic cache register routines removedThe patches look good, and I've applied them for now in my 'devel' branch so we can test them, but I'd like to get an Ack/Nack from Bruce before committing to merging them.Cool, thanks. BTW, these patches depends on patch "NFSd: use network-namespace- aware cache registering routines", which Bruce took already (and it's even in linux-next already), but not in your devel tree for some reason.In that case, would it make more sense to carry them in Bruce's tree?
It's up to you, of course. But, frankly, I don't think so.
To be more precise, only the last patch ("SUNRPC: generic cache register
routines removed") depends on the patch, which is in linux-next already. IOW,
those patch removed NFSd dependence on cache_register() and cache_unregister()
routines and was commited to linux-next at Wed, 7 Dec 2011.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky