Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 5 authors, 2012-01-13

Re: [PATCH] net_sched: sfq: add optional RED on top of SFQ

From: Rick Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-06 19:43:40

On 01/06/2012 11:33 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 10:30 -0800, Rick Jones a écrit :
quoted
netperf nitpick :)  While I doubt that Dave Taht is running it that way,
one can have multiple requests in flight on a single _RR test via the
test-specific -b<additionaltrans>  option.  That option is enabled by
default (--enable-burst on the configure) in 2.5.0 and later.
Ah Rick, I dont think we can tune IP_TOS with netperf -t UDP_{STREAM|
RR} ?

I ask because it could be a good thing to set ECT(0) on datagrams to
check our ECN capabilities and get in the final report from receiver a
count/percentage of CE frames.
Funny you should mention that :)  In the top-of-trunk (perhaps it is in 
2.5.0 too, I do not recall) there is the global -Y option:

$ src/netperf -Y
src/netperf: option requires an argument -- 'Y'

Usage: netperf [global options] -- [test options]

Global options:
...
     -y local,remote   Set the socket priority
     -Y local,remote   Set the IP_TOS. Use hexadecimal.

So long as you either use the omni code directly, or indirectly by not 
undoing WANT_MIGRATION those should work - for some definition of work 
anyway...I would not be surprised to learn there are bugs in the support.

However, there is nothing presently in the netperf code to cause any 
*individual* send to be so marked independently of the others.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help