Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 5 authors, 2012-01-13

Re: [PATCH] net_sched: sfq: add optional RED on top of SFQ

From: Rick Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-06 18:30:48

On 01/06/2012 09:07 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 17:56 +0100, Dave Taht a écrit :
quoted
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Eric Dumazet[off-list ref]  wrote:
quoted
Adds an optional Random Early Detection on each SFQ flow queue.
netperf -t TCP_RR is useful
-t TCP_MAERTS will be interesting.
simultaneous ping?
I dont know what you expect from pings, since they are already coming in
new flows (unless a ping flood is in effect), so RED doesnt fire for
these packets.

Same for TCP_RR : Since at most one packet is in flight per flow, RED
cannot fire.
netperf nitpick :)  While I doubt that Dave Taht is running it that way, 
one can have multiple requests in flight on a single _RR test via the 
test-specific -b <additionaltrans> option.  That option is enabled by 
default (--enable-burst on the configure) in 2.5.0 and later.

netperf -t TCP_RR ...  -- -b 1

will cause netperf to have two transactions in flight at one time, -b 3 
will have four etc etc (actually it "slow-starts" to get to that level). 
  This can also be (ab)used to implement a single-connection, 
bi-directional throughput test such as I have in my "runemomni" scripts 
under doc/examples.  For example:

netperf -t TCP_RR ... -- -s 1M -S 1M -r 64K -b 12

As there is no select() or poll() call in the path, it is best to ensure 
that the SO_SNDBUF size on either end is large enough to hold 
[request|response]_size*simultaneous_trans at one time.

Depending on the size of the requests/responses one may want to add the 
test-specific -D option to set TCP_NODELAY.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help