On 09/27/2011 09:58 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:18:39 -0300
Glauber Costa[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

On 09/26/2011 07:34 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

quoted

On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:56:39 -0300
Glauber Costa[off-list ref]   wrote:

"If parent sets use_hierarchy==1, children must have the same kmem_independent value

quoted

quoted

with parant's one."

How do you think ? I think a hierarchy must have the same config.

BTW, Kame:

Look again (I forgot myself when I first replied to you)
Only in the root cgroup those files get registered.
So shouldn't be a problem, because children won't even
be able to see them.

Do you agree with this ?

agreed.

Actually it is the other way around, following previous suggestions...

The root cgroup does *not* get those files registered, since we don't 
intend to do any kernel memory limitation for it. The others get it.
Given that, I will proceed writing some code to respect parent cgroup's
hierarchy.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>