On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:01:32 -0300
Glauber Costa [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/09/2011 12:12 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:23:16 -0300
Glauber Costa[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
With all the infrastructure in place, this patch implements
per-cgroup control for tcp memory pressure handling.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<redacted>
CC: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<redacted>
CC: Eric W. Biederman<redacted>
Hmm, then, kmem_cgroup.c is just a caller of plugins implemented
by other components ?
Kame,
Refer to my discussion with Greg. How would you feel about it being
accounted to a single "kernel memory" limit in memcg?
Hmm, it's argued that 'cgroup is hard to use, it's difficult!!!'.
Then, if implementation is clean, I think it may be good to add
kmem limit to memcg.
Your and Greg's idea is to have
memory.kmem_limit_in_bytes
?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>