On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:48:36PM -0400, bfields wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:30:05PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
quoted
Sent from my iPhone
On 29/07/2011, at 22:11, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 21:58 +1000, Greg Banks a écrit :
quoted
Sure, and a whole lot of the callsites are ("..._%d", cpu), hence the
unfortune :(
BTW, we could name nfsd threads differently :
Currently, they all are named : "nfsd"
If SVC_POOL_PERCPU is selected, we could name them :
nfsd_c0 -> nfsd_cN
If SVC_POOL_PERNODE is selected, we could name them :
nfsd_n0 -> nfsd_nN
That would help to check with "ps aux" which cpu/nodes are under
stress.
I like it!
Yup, patch welcomed.--b.
(Annoying fact: some initscripts stop nfsd using a rough equivalent of
"killall nfsd". So the name of the threads is arguably ABI. I think
those initscripts are nuts and deserve what they get, but that may be
because I'm forgetting the reason they do that.)
--b.