On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:30:05PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:

Sent from my iPhone

On 29/07/2011, at 22:11, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 21:58 +1000, Greg Banks a écrit :

quoted

Sure, and a whole lot of the callsites are ("..._%d", cpu), hence the
unfortune :(

BTW, we could name nfsd threads differently :

Currently, they all are named : "nfsd"

If SVC_POOL_PERCPU is selected, we could name them :
nfsd_c0 -> nfsd_cN

If SVC_POOL_PERNODE is selected, we could name them :
nfsd_n0  -> nfsd_nN

That would help to check with "ps aux" which cpu/nodes are under  
stress.

I like it!

Yup, patch welcomed.--b.