Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities
From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-29 16:48:45
Also in:
linux-nfs, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-08-05 · Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities · J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
- 2011-07-29 · Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities · Greg Banks <hidden>
- 2011-07-29 · Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities · J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
- 2011-07-29 · Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities · Eric Dumazet <hidden>
- 2011-07-29 · Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities · J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:30:05PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
Sent from my iPhone On 29/07/2011, at 22:11, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 21:58 +1000, Greg Banks a écrit :quoted
Sure, and a whole lot of the callsites are ("..._%d", cpu), hence the unfortune :(BTW, we could name nfsd threads differently : Currently, they all are named : "nfsd" If SVC_POOL_PERCPU is selected, we could name them : nfsd_c0 -> nfsd_cN If SVC_POOL_PERNODE is selected, we could name them : nfsd_n0 -> nfsd_nN That would help to check with "ps aux" which cpu/nodes are under stress.I like it!
Yup, patch welcomed.--b.