[PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 01/14] mm: Serialize access to min_free_kbytes · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
Re: [PATCH 01/14] mm: Serialize access to min_free_kbytes · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-07-06
Re: [PATCH 01/14] mm: Serialize access to min_free_kbytes · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-07-07
[PATCH 06/14] net: Introduce sk_allocation() to allow addition of GFP flags depending on the individual socket · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 04/14] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 09/14] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 10/14] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 14/14] mm: Account for the number of times direct reclaimers get throttled · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 13/14] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 12/14] nbd: Set SOCK_MEMALLOC for access to PFMEMALLOC reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 11/14] mm: Micro-optimise slab to avoid a function call · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 08/14] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 07/14] netvm: Allow the use of __GFP_MEMALLOC by specific sockets · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 05/14] mm: Ignore mempolicies when using ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 03/14] mm: Introduce __GFP_MEMALLOC to allow access to emergency reserves · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
[PATCH 02/14] mm: sl[au]b: Add knowledge of PFMEMALLOC reserve pages · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-06-20
Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-07-06
Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-07-07
Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-07
Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 · Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> · 2011-07-15
Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-15

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-07-15 15:27:46
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:

Any objection to the swap-over-NBD stuff going ahead to get part of the
complexity out of the way?

Sure, that's what I was advocating for.  The filesystem interfaces in
the current swap over nbd patches on the other hand are complete crap
and need to be redone, but we've already discussed that a lot of times.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help