Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:12:06 +0100
Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:

Swapping over NBD is something that is technically possible but not
often advised. While there are number of guides on the internet
on how to configure it and nbd-client supports a -swap switch to
"prevent deadlocks", the fact of the matter is a machine using NBD
for swap can be locked up within minutes if swap is used intensively.

The problem is that network block devices do not use mempools like
normal block devices do. As the host cannot control where they receive
packets from, they cannot reliably work out in advance how much memory
they might need.

Some years ago, Peter Ziljstra developed a series of patches that
supported swap over an NFS that some distributions are carrying in
their kernels. This patch series borrows very heavily from Peter's work
to support swapping over NBD (the relatively straight-forward case)
and uses throttling instead of dynamically resized memory reserves
so the series is not too unwieldy for review.

I have to say, I look over these patches and my mind wants to turn to
things like puppies.  And ice cream.

There's quite some complexity added here in areas which are already
reliably unreliable and afaik swap-over-NBD is not a thing which a lot
of people want to do.  I can see that swap-over-NFS would be useful to
some people, and the fact that distros are carrying swap-over-NFS
patches has weight.

Do these patches lead on to swap-over-NFS?  If so, how much more
additional complexity are we buying into for that?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>