Re: [patch] skbuff: use kfree_skb() instead of kfree()
From: Julie Sullivan <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-20 21:03:53
Also in:
kernel-janitors
quoted
quoted
quoted
Also, dont forget to say its a patch for net-next-2.6If you're using linux-next, is there a way to tell which tree a patch came from? Obviously in this case it's core networking, but in other cases how does that work?In this particular case, David will know for sure since patch is very recent, but I wanted to make a general advice. Keep in mind David has to review dozens of patches _per_ day, so netdev related patches need some extra cooperation from submitters to help the maintainer. This extra cooperation means to test the patch on either net-next-2.6 or net-2.6 tree ;)Maybe there is some way to integrate such a suggestion in get_maintainers or checkpatch? Otherwise, those who work on the code in a more breadth first way don't have much chance of knowing or remembering this advice. julia
I think Julia's observation is really on the nail, I wish there were some way of doing this? If new or random testers or reviewers out there aren't tracking/following a particular tree/project already - i.e. if they don't _know_ beforehand, aren't they going to just assume using linux-next is correct (at least that's what I do)? Knowing what branch to most productively test patches against beforehand might encourage more testers and submissions and also could make maintainer's jobs a bit easier. Cheers Julie