Re: [patch] skbuff: use kfree_skb() instead of kfree()
From: Julia Lawall <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-20 08:38:04
Also in:
kernel-janitors
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 11:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :quoted
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :quoted
Crap. Sorry, I shouldn't have sent that. We shouldn't return the freed "n" here. I'll send a v2 shortly.Also, dont forget to say its a patch for net-next-2.6If you're using linux-next, is there a way to tell which tree a patch came from? Obviously in this case it's core networking, but in other cases how does that work?In this particular case, David will know for sure since patch is very recent, but I wanted to make a general advice. Keep in mind David has to review dozens of patches _per_ day, so netdev related patches need some extra cooperation from submitters to help the maintainer. This extra cooperation means to test the patch on either net-next-2.6 or net-2.6 tree ;)
Maybe there is some way to integrate such a suggestion in get_maintainers or checkpatch? Otherwise, those who work on the code in a more breadth first way don't have much chance of knowing or remembering this advice. julia