Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2011-07-21

Re: [patch] skbuff: use kfree_skb() instead of kfree()

From: Julia Lawall <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-20 08:38:04
Also in: kernel-janitors

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 11:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
quoted
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
quoted
Crap.  Sorry, I shouldn't have sent that.  We shouldn't return the
freed "n" here.  I'll send a v2 shortly.
Also, dont forget to say its a patch for net-next-2.6
If you're using linux-next, is there a way to tell which tree a
patch came from?  Obviously in this case it's core networking, but
in other cases how does that work?
In this particular case, David will know for sure since patch is very
recent, but I wanted to make a general advice.

Keep in mind David has to review dozens of patches _per_ day, so netdev
related patches need some extra cooperation from submitters to help the
maintainer.

This extra cooperation means to test the patch on either net-next-2.6 or
net-2.6 tree ;)
Maybe there is some way to integrate such a suggestion in get_maintainers 
or checkpatch?  Otherwise, those who work on the code in a more breadth 
first way don't have much chance of knowing or remembering this advice.

julia
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help