Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: remove NETIF_F_NO_CSUM feature
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: 2011-07-15 00:28:43
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:05:06PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:44:45 +0200quoted
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:31:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:56:23 +0200quoted
That's why its turned off by default and should be enabled only when user knows he will win some pps with it.More people are going to lose than win by your change. The nocopy feature helps more real situations than it hurts, the existing default is the best.I see. I still want to remove NO_CSUM (as I explained in other mail), so would you accept replacing it with something more specific to nocache-copy feature? READS_DATA maybe? That could be later added to sk_route_caps whenever it's known for a route there will be need to read packets' data.I don't actually see what the problem is. The code wants to conditionalize the nocache-copy feature based upon whether hardware will checksum the packet or not. And that's exactly what it's testing. The reason, of course, is because it doesn't want to enable nocache-copy if the cpu is just going to read the data back into it's caches during the checksum. But that's no reason to change the flag name to have the word "read" instead of "checksum" in it.
But the real condition is that CPU doesn't read the data. I doesn't matter if reading is to calculate the checksum or parsing it. The change would make this obvious. BTW, Best Regards, Michał Mirosław