RE: [RFC 2/2] ethtool: Add support for DMA Coalescing feature config to ethtool.
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-21 17:38:16
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 10:23 -0700, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:54 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; bhutchings@solarflare.com Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] ethtool: Add support for DMA Coalescing feature config to ethtool. From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <redacted> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:50:11 -0700quoted
I will add a fuller description of the feature in my updated patch. I thought the feature was more well known. Quick description is that it's a power saving feature that causes the adapter to coalesce its DMA writes at low traffic times to save power on the platform by reducing wakeups. The parameter is intended as a simple u32 value, not just an on or off, but also to allow a variety of configuration by adapter vendors, with validation of the input on the driver side. Since I left out the implementation in my patch, this wasn't clear. I will also fix this in my next submission.The value cannot have adapter specific meaning, you must define it precisely and in a generic manner, such that the user can specify the same setting across different card types.Ok, good point. I will refine the definition of the parameter in the next submission, once the dust clears on the major revisions in progress.
You may wish to propose a new command structure that covers both IRQ and DMA moderation. They seem to be related, since DMA cannot be delayed longer than the corresponding IRQ. We are currently lacking a way to specify different IRQ moderation for multiqueue devices where the queues are not all used in the same way. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.