On Wed, 25 May 2011, Michal Marek wrote:

Dne 5.4.2011 17:10, Armin Schindler napsal(a):

quoted

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote:

quoted

The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
time.

The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have
an own build timestamp.

So the module timestamp and kernel timestamp vary by a couple of
minutes. But is it really a problem?

It could be a lot more than minutes. But it isn't a problem.
I just tried to keep the sources in sync with out-of-tree version.

I don't think so. So is there an
objection against applying this patch?

No objection. Please go ahead with the patch.

Thanks
Armin