Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in netdevice
From: Michał Mirosław <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-18 11:47:56
Also in:
kvm, lkml
W dniu 18 maja 2011 13:17 użytkownik Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] napisał:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:10:50PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:quoted
2011/5/18 Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref]:quoted
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:28:38PM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:48 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:quoted
2011/5/17 Shirley Ma [off-list ref]:quoted
Hello Michael, Looks like to use a new flag requires more time/work. I am thinking whether we can just use HIGHDMA flag to enable zero-copy in macvtaptoquoted
avoid the new flag for now since mavctap uses real NICs as lowerdevice? Is there any other restriction besides requiring driver to not recycle the skb? Are there any drivers that recycle TX skbs?Not just recycling skbs, keeping reference to any of the pages in the skb. Another requirement is to invoke the callback in a timely fashion. For example virtio-net doesn't limit the time until that happens (skbs are only freed when some other packet is transmitted), so we need to avoid zcopy for such (nested-virt) scenarious, right?Hmm. But every hardware driver supporting SG will keep reference to the pages until the packet is sent (or DMA'd to the device). This can take a long time if hardware queue happens to stall for some reason.That's a fundamental property of zero copy transmit. You can't let the application/guest reuse the memory until no one looks at it anymore.
One more question: is userspace (or whatever is sending those packets) denied from modifying passed pages? I assume it is, but just want to be sure. Best Regards, Michał Mirosław