Re: [PATCH] xen: drop anti-dependency on X86_VISWS
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2011-04-07 17:01:16
Also in:
xen-devel
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2011-04-07 17:01:16
Also in:
xen-devel
On 04/06/2011 11:58 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not sure why ELAN belongs in the EXTENDED_PLATFORM option space rather than in the CPU choice option, since its only impact seems to be on -march, MODULE_PROC_FAMILY and some cpufreq drivers which doesn't sound like an extended platform to me but does it appear to be deliberate (see 9e111f3e167a "x86: move ELAN to the NON_STANDARD_PLATFORM section", that was the old name for EXTENDED_PLATFORM).
Historic... we used to have nonstandard A20M# handling on Elan, until it was discovered that we could make it work without it. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.