Le 03/03/2011 14:53, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 18:55 +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
quoted
Consider network topology as follows:
eth0 eth1
|_____|
|
bond0 --- br0
|
vlan0 --- br1
bond0 serves for both br0 and vlan0, if a vlan tagged packet was sent
to br1 through bond0, bridge handling code is seeing the packet on bond0
and handing it off to my "legacy" bridge before vlan_tx_tag_present
and vlan_hwaccel_do_receive even haven't a chance to look at it.
[...]
This used to work if the underlying device (bond0 in your example)
implemented VLAN tag extraction, because the VLAN group would be checked
before the bridge. But it never worked for devices without VLAN tag
extraction. Perhaps we should just prevent this configuration.
If Jiri Pirko eventually move vlan processing to rx_handler, then the setup won't be possible,
because bond0 would require two rx_handlers : one for bridge (-> br0) and one for vlan (-> vlan0).
Or we need several rx_handlers per net_device, if the above setup is a real one.
Nicolas.