Re: [PATCH] don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev kernel modules
From: Michael Tokarev <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-28 09:29:15
Also in:
lkml
27.02.2011 23:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 25 February 2011, Michał Mirosław wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 54aaca6..0d09baa 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c@@ -1120,8 +1120,20 @@ void dev_load(struct net *net, const char *name) dev = dev_get_by_name_rcu(net, name); rcu_read_unlock(); - if (!dev && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) - request_module("%s", name); + if (!dev && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) { + /* Check whether the name looks like one that a net + * driver will generate initially. If not, require a + * module alias with a suitable prefix, so that this + * can't be used to load arbitrary modules. + */ + if ((strncmp(name, "eth", 3) == 0 && + isdigit((unsigned char)name[3])) || + (strncmp(name, "wlan", 4) == 0 && + isdigit((unsigned char)name[4]))) + request_module("%s", name); + else + request_module("netdev-%s", name); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_load);This might be better as: if (request_module("netdev-%s", name)) ... fallback Then after some years the fallback could be removed if announced properly.The backwards compatibility should mostly be for systems that today don't use split capabilities, right? The fallback could therefore rely on CAP_SYS_MODULE as well: if (request_module("netdev-%s", name)) { if (capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE)) request_module("%s", name); } Not 100% solution, but should solve the capability escalation nicely without causing much pain.
To me this looks like the best solution so far - trivial and compatible. Thanks! /mjt